Comic Sans was An alternative history... 4296

Sir Ray,

It really gets down to whether there is a flaw in the concept somewhere. All I really did was holler about the lack of clothing on the King that comes from 35 years of architecture stagnation. 2^35 = 34*10^9 which should have been the improvement ratio during those 35 years, but we have fallen short by ~10^4 (OK, so it is hard to compare a 4004 to an Intel Duo). I am just showing how to pick up that 10^4 that has been "left on the table" by everyone deciding not to continue architecture evolution.

Whether that and a scanning UV fluorescence uScope is enough to live forever remains to be seen, but it probably IS enough to see what ELSE is needed.

I agree. I'm out of this thread, so if anyone has something IMPORTANT to say to me about Comic Sans, then please email me directly, but don't forget to first rip the NOSPAM from my email address.

In my absence from this thread, please feel free to continue arguing about Windows 3.1, antique browsers, the problems with Comic Sans for which there is no obvious solution, etc., etc.

Thanks Sir Ray for the suggestion to exit this thread.

Steve Richfie1d