The Case of the Outsourced IT Survey or, The Ugly American answers the phone 1082

Reread what I wrote; I was talking about female disapproval.

Let me give you some examples. I was not one of them because I wouldn't go onto the management track. I was not one of them because I didn't go out on protests to show my "support". The fact that I was the first female to obtain a mortgage at a bank, make all of my payments on time so that the bank was willing to take a risk lending money to the next female with no male support didn't count. People who spoke to me were females who didn't work and had the luxury of telling working females what they should do. I didn't hear this claptrap from women who worked in factories.

Perhaps because you're younger than I am.

Nope. The US amendment proposal.

I'm 54 years old. I voted on the ERA.

Sigh! Now read the rest of it; the devil is always in the details.

I don't recall the problem anymore. As a guess, it's the Pandora's box that the amendment opened up.

All spouts out of these peoples' mouths insist that it is the "right" of all females to work and have kids; if she has problems doing both at the same time, then the government has to help by giving her money. Have you noticed the absence of some crucial details in all of this?

A LITTLE MISGUIDED? This was the very first test of convention security after 9-11.

It was the next convenient holiday (Labor Day).

I heard it on a radio talk show.

I can think of quite a few. All food processing plants; anything completely tied up by unions; H&R Block; any retail around Christmas; teaching; any factory that makes widgets.

But we knew how Gore would react. National security was an anti-goal. AAMOF, these people (Clinton and Gore)did everything they could to undermine national security.

We know that he isn't going to pule about talking with the enemy to see what we should do to make the enemy happy.

BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.