| PLEX86 | ||
The DDP 24 FloatingPoint Format, and OthersFinally, I found out what the floating-point format of the DDP-24 was; it was in the last manual I downloaded (from Al Kossow's site, or rather one of its mirrors)... it was similar to the weird formats common on other 24-bit computers (I discuss the rationale on my page at 1401S, 1470 "last gasp" computers 494 The 1622 was a card reader-punch unit for the IBM 1620. The plotter I worked with wasn't an IBM product; it was a... which I believe has to do with the fact that these machines, in general, did multiplication in hardware, but not floating-point) but it had one ADDITIONAL bit of weirdness. 1401S, 1470 "last gasp" computers 493 Tim Shoppa I think the differences were that the 1401-S and 1470 would've been direct compebreastion to S-360 models 30 and 40 which they didn't want. They wanted the 14xx users to... As it used sign-magnitude representation, it placed the sign of the exponent in the sign bit of the second word, not contiguous with the exponent at the *end* of the word. I buttume, but am not certain, that the software floating-point format on the SDS 920-930-940 computers was identical to the hardware floating-point format on the 9300; perhaps downloading the FORTRAN manuals for these machines will explain this, or perhaps I can peruse certain other things I've already downloaded. Still mysterious is the floating-point format of the CDC 924. As this machine performed 24 x 24 = 48 bit multiplication in conventional integer form, with no attempt to make the result work as a proper fraction without shifting instead, I suspect this one's complement machine used a *conventional* floating-point format, like that of the 1604, but I cannot be certain. John Savard
|
||||
1401S, 1470 "last gasp" computers 493 Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||