| PLEX86 | ||
The Pankian Metaphor 3143ref: The Pankian Metaphor wasGoodbye to USENET 3147 On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:03:28 +0200, Morten Reistad I saved the message for studying later, but there are several points I agree... so for another method of coming up with first order approximation, is to move all existing fuel taxes to just heavy trucking fuel use. the detailed road design articles claim that the number of heavy truck axle-loads is the driving factor and that all other types of vehicle use can be ignored. so first order approximation is to recover the same current total fuel taxes by just taxing fuel used by heavy trucks. the 2nd order approximation is that fuel taxes only cover a portion of road building and operations. to get better approx.of total heavy truck related infrastructure cost, divide the the initial approxmimation by the fraction of total road build and operation costs covered by fuel taxes. The Pankian Metaphor 3145 in my original post, i postulated that you could have numbers for both types of... so some guesses about actual values and then the formula ... and then initial approximation. The Pankian Metaphor 3144 re: somewhat along the theme of metrics, instrumentation, analysis, benchmarking, being able to correlate projected results with actual outcomes, auditing, etc ... recent article Decision-Support Systems: Lessons from... first we need to know the current avg. fuel taxes-gal, lets say is sixty cents for estimated avg. combined-total fuel taxes. then we need to know the percent of total fuel consumption by heavy trucking ... for calculations I'll use a maximum of .05 and a minium of .01 (i.e. heavy trucking industry accounts for somewhere between 1percent and 5percent of total highway fuel consumption). then first order approximation (moving nearly all fuel taxes from all vehicles to just heavy trucking as first order approx) is within the range of $.60-(max .05, min .01) = (min $12-gal, max $60-gal) so the 2nd order approx. is what portion of total road costs (build and operate) is covered by fuel taxes. for calculations lets buttume that it is somewhere in the .3 to .5 range (the rest funded by general revenues). the improved calculation then is (min $12, max $60)-(max .5, min .3) = (min $24-gal, max $200-gal) so an initial guestimate as to transferring fully loaded heavy trucking infrastructure costs to the heavy trucking industry via the use of per gal. fuel tax comes up to be in the range of between $24-gal and $200-gal, your actual mileage may vary if you come up with more accurate values to my guestimates. For instance, if you use a value of $.40-gal for total fuel tax, the range drops to The Pankian Metaphor wasGoodbye to USENET 3148 This is an important clue to what is going on in China. They support the US economy, but keep the Yuan low. This sucks... $.40-(max .05, min .01) = (min $8-gal, max $30-gal) and (min $8, max $30)-(max. .5, min .3) = (min $16-gal, max $100-gal) If it turns out that the heavy trucking industry only accounts for half percent of total highway fuel consumption, it changes the calculation to $.60-.005 = $120-gal and ($120-gal)-(max .5, min .3) = (min $240-gal, max $400-gal) -- Tribulations in Boston was: The Pankian Metaphor The long-term parking is also cheaper at PVD (TF Green International, the Providence airport) than at Logan, it's easier to get around, your flight is probably less...
|
||||
Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||