Thou shalt have no other gods before the ANSI C standard 1440

Sure. In this case, you want the computer to self-destruct. Security can take completely opposite forms. It all depends on what you're trying to keep secure. In the case of flying planes, continuity and consistency is the security goal. In the case of a data base, burning itself up is the security goal.

They are doing this because we have forced them to have to do a paradigm shift. They have just found out that they have no idea how much they don't know. So they have to "prove" us wrong on something. Picking out something I never said is the usual tactic.

I see no scenarios that have a scintilla of reality in them. All those discussions pick a piece of a security breach and discuss it out of context. I can think of cases where a security action taken is a security breach and visa versa.

These people simply are not paranoid enough. They think most of the security problems can be solved by perfect code. This is so far from the truth it's become frightening because this is also what is getting taught. And that's why I poked my virtual bat that that PhD.

BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.