| PLEX86 | ||
US Military Dead during Iraq War 1048Beth ... snip ... Which was precisely what you said. The fact that you modified it somewhere deep in the bowels of an excessive (to my mind) post is not germane. The following is a verbatim quote from my reply to you. The portions I quoted there were continuous, snipping was only done before and after, and was so marked. --------- BEGIN verbatim quote ---------- When the Romans left there were no Anglo-Saxons around - just Britons. The Angles, Saxons, and Jutes came later, and filled the power vacuum. IIRC Churchill covers it quite well. See "The History of the English Speaking Peoples". ... 800 odd lines snipped unread - enough is enough ... ------------ END Verbatim quote --------- I more or less agree with you in general. I just don't think that excessive verbosity is especially useful. It may show off your typing ability. It doesn't especially expose your editing capability. It does tend to clog a.f.c. Like source code functions, each message should be capable of fitting in a single screen. Or nearly so. The rule of 7 applies to usenet articles and to functional modules. US Military Dead during Iraq War 1049 and somewhere This was part of a longer story told about intelligence gathering during the first gulf war. The storyteller wasn't very technically inclined... -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
|
||||
US Military Dead during Iraq War 1049 Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||