PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |  Newsgroups

What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2038


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

Eric Chomko

It strikes me that you have a very narrow definition of success. Alpha made money hand over fist, DEC's dissolution had very little to do with Alpha's success or "failure".

Neither the PowerPC nor Pentium made significant in-roads into the Technical computing market until very recently. The Alpha competed against POWER, MIPS and SPARC, and the P6 (Pentium Pro) derivatives. POWER != PowerPC.

Granted, BlueGene-L has proven to be an Ace up the Sleeve for IBM in the technical computing market.

What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2039
Kelli Halliburton WHOA there... Pentium Pro *DID NOT* have MMX at all. MMX was a quick graft onto the late rev Pentium (aka "586") cores, too late for it to be...

SNIP

To be blunt DEC's Intel boxes were --ing awful and grossly over priced.

Sun are going AMD64. Intel is *way* behind on power density, scalability, RAS and sustained performance. AMD64's feature set bears strong similarities to EV7.

I think you are pinning the tail on the wrong donkey here. If you want to rip a hole in chips orientated towards technical computing perhaps you should take a good hard look at the Itanic, pay particular attention to road map. Take note of the rapidly falling clock speeds, increasing lead times, and the axed designs.

be shipping right up to the last iteration of IA-64, not bad for a "wannabe". Also note that the Alpha still has a placing in the Top-500 list despite a 7 year old core. That should speak volumes in a trade that is used to 2x speed ups every year.

Cheers, Rupert



Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next

What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2039

Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet

What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2037