| PLEX86 | ||
What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2119when i was doing page replacement algorithms as undergraduate in the 60s one of the principles was to perform overhead directly related to some activity and-or resource constraint. What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2120 On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:04:39 +0000, greymaus The CLI had been resembling UNIX since 1985. Can you be... at the time, i noticed that the version of tss-360 ... when activating a tasked characterized as "interactive" one first attempt to move all the related virtual pages from 2311 (moveable arm) disk to the 2301 (fixed head) drum before actually starting the task running ... and then when the task suspended ... move all the related pages off the 2301 drum back to the 2311 ... even when there was no contention for 2301 space. part of this was that i was well into dynamic adaptive algorithms at the time ... not only for virtual memory scheduling resources but also for dispatching and managing other resources. this is in part, where the "wheeler" and "fair-share" scheduler originated ... although the scheduler wasn't specifically fair-share ... it had resource policies ... where a possible default policy was fair-share. What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2121 Yes. And they still do, no matter how lovey the shortcuts are. Yes. And a timesharing system that does its job well, give each... What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2122 Oh yes... never expect them to think. By suggesting to them that they use one... in the very late 70s ... I got contacted by somebody from POK that had made a major change in MVS to not arbritrary flush pages from real memory back to disk when task quiesced-suspended in cases when there wasn't contention for real memory. He had gotten a large corporate award for the change ... and wanted to get another award for doing the same thing to vm370. I commented that I had never, not done it that way ... dating back to when I first started ten years earlier. Furthermore I had tried to convince the people that were responsible for the SVS (and then MVS) implementation to not do it that way back in the early 70s ... and they insisted on doing it anyway. i may have even commented that in addition to given an award to the person that fixed it ... that possibly at least the amount of the award should be deducted from the compensation of the people that had insisted on doing it wrong in the first place. --
|
||||
What ever happened to Tandem and NonStop OS 2120 Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||