breastle screen for HLA Adventure Need help designing one 863
I'm not slightly upset. You are threading dangerous trends. I am the one who is telling you "no".
That may be part of why you are not using any analytical thinking.
Here you are doing it again. To disagree with you is to be thinking in the box whilst you are thinking outside the box. The opposite is true. said
No, Einstein did not say Newton was wrong.
Oh, bullpoo. You need to learn about science and logic (the real kind) and objective thinking.
You are completely stuck in "truth based on authority" and have been ceding authority to people who spout nonsense.
breastle screen for HLA Adventure Need help designing one 864
jmfbahciv More contradiction in your logic: You post to defend "consensus", you claim...but then form a minority of ONE...
Yes, they can.
No. What you have just described is truth by consensus no matter what the evidence shows. is
No they are not subjective views. Please stop using scientific and math terms for local, personal beliefs.
viewing to could
This is not the objectivity I'm talking about. and
You are completely, utterly wrong. The Scientific Method is never based on consensus.
In science, the more voices the greater the noise. If all voices were combined, there would be no signal. the
You are not even wrong.
Rule by the majority leads directly to dictatorship. At least you are admitting, albeit indirectly, that this is your agenda. or
Long posts was: breastle screen for HLA Adventure 865
CBFalconer Silly insults are not at all productive... But, as well EVERYONE reading here knows...
Your judgement is so cloudy, you can't tell nonsense from fact.
No, you are not arguing for Liberty. Oh, your words say that but the bias is slanted towards equality for all which can only be achieved by removing the check rein that libery provides.
When did I accuse you of this? You are the one who is using this example to promote your intent. You are using negative emotional appeal to manipulate people to agree with you. You are counting on human psychology which takes sides. If they are "against" Nazis, and the mores of Western society are, then they will automatically accept your other nonsense, no matter how outlandish it is. You have presented your claim as being on the "other side" of the Nazis. Except...your agenda is to promote similar thinking that the Nazis had. The examples you pretend support your positions make this clear.
Now you demand evidence which is a typical smoke and mirrors ploy. You have set up your articles so that whenever anybody points out that your text is promoting a similar regime, you can vociferously object and ask for evidence. There is a word for this kind of manipulation of people. sometime...thus
I will not tolerate people whose intent is to take away my freedoms. I will say no. if
You are doing this on purpose. It is still possible that you're getting real time help but your use of language is too consistent. I can't believe that people have let you get away with this crap.
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
Alt Folklore Computers Newsgroups