breastle screen for HLA Adventure Need help designing one 960

keith & rpl continue to ramble...... mutual non-sequitur snippage

a) Sam Waterman ? I think he's a news anchor, no ? b) If I am "privy to clbuttifed information" then I have a legal obligation not to release it (I am and I am and I don't)

Ohhhhh... my bad (I think); I was reading your "Isn't it a reasonable thing to not tip off a person that feds are onto him?" that you make presumptions of guilt.

In that case isn't it a reasonable thing to tip off a non-person that "the feds are onto him" ?

(seriously: I'm not sure how it works currently, but surely any citizen who has had a wiretap or secret investigation against or involving him should be informed of that fact when the investigation is closed or has been dormant for a certain amount of time)

That's the door that you've opened, not I.

and proceeded to prove yourself a liar and-or idiot since in the same post (this one previous) you continue to pretend that I'm someone else or that I've made statements I haven't:

"but did you notice where you're arguing that they were taken prisoner in a military campaign but aren't "Prisoners of War" ?

I'm unsure what part you imagine I got from regurgitation or the CBC since I was explicitly commenting on your words, verbatim. And just to halt another non-existent rejoinder, if you look up aways I note where the discrepancy was explained by another poster. Perhaps you'd like to argue with that person?

And no, I don't like cheap shots; they're a waste of time and substandard ammunition.

Does this phrase ring a bell?:

"Not having researched the subject I'll leave it at that"

Not sure it applies since you aren't specifically referring to me.

go figger eh.

yeah, no poo :

No, actually that was just me unpleasant womaning that you still seemed to think I was "TMI"

Comic Debt Relief to balance a non-sequitur.

Which one are you ?

Then please make comments where relevant... how many paragraphs back of the one you wrote was the one you were responding to ?

As useful a tool as studied ignorance is to the politician, that's a waste of time.

I'd like to amend that a bit; cops driving around catch criminals after an act has been committed.

We may have different subway systems; are you advocating putting city-sponsored surveillance on private property ? Are you disadvocating live patrols of high-crime areas ?

by extension are you now advocating putting guns on those cameras ?

sorry... "Gitmo" ?

An analogy for something silly... "sub-minimum prison facility" then ?

rpl

Don't get me wrong, I don't care much if I'm being "surveilled" by people that I appoint and trust... having the operator of the block-camera e-mail me with "ya know, white siding would go better with the house" or "you dropped your keys in the grbutt... nope a little to the left... that's it" would be ... interesting if not particularly useful.

But having somebody who isn't personally responsible to me do it ?