creat 1213

Perhaps our differences are due to our concept of "presently constructed". My whole life has been taking presently constructed thingies and making newer thingies. Or thinking about how to today's thingies can be modified to make new thingies.

It's almost as natural as breathing....it is as natural as breathing.

No,no,no. Part of the design would be to "convert" from the old way as seamlessly as possible if world-wide conversion is a design goal.

Well, if it's an uphill battle, we had better start now so we can reach the apex sooner. There is something wrong if a development is not an uphill battle. If it were all downhill, there wouldn't be any need for bit gods.

I'm not either. I've spent some thinking time on this over the last 24 hours, and the vocabulary of the CMMND JSYS has to be built dynamically on a per-user basis.

It's this way because the computing biz has had a paradigm over the last 10 years where the common man has started to learn how to use and the existence of computers. You can't find an ad anymore that doesn't have a W^3 or a hitemel in it. The sooner we start thinking that the term PC implies personal computing, instead of personal computer, the sooner we'll be starting to clean up this emoticon looks around the biz with distaste mess.

But we don't know this anymore. Each command needs to be looked at with a new set of eyeglbuttes. IOW, I want to think outside the box for a while.

Nah. That's not the reason. The real reason that it's not catching on is because we haven't thought of a carrot that's attractive enough or we haven't thought of a way to transit the implementation. This is all part of the design phase.

But we make them care. Why do you think people bought DEC stuff. They liked to use our stuff.

BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.