creat 1215

I agree which is why I'm so puzzled.

But didn't anybody realize this before now? This was so obvious to me and that's why I started arguing with Patrick. As long as you have the data, you can package it up in meatballs. The pesky problems are building a vocabulary at initiation time; a one-plusser would be to add to that vocabulary as the system is used through time. The really pesky problem would be consistency across computer systems. As people move from one system to another a feature would be to carry one's commands set with them. This ties into your idea about plugging in a cigarette lighter into any system and having the complete system context at the end of your last usage continued.

Heh. Just for fun, define a "real" commands for me.

Ring 0? I'm presuming you're talking about the first software layer that a user's context is wrapped in?

a "different" graphical interface. I don't see much difference between GUI and the litany of hardware settings that had to be set softly to get the screen painting the user liked. As TW would say, "A small matter of programming."

BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.