| PLEX86 | ||
transputers again was: The dissolution of Commodore 2932
Let me guess... he argued that this generated faster code than doing it with an aggregate table? I have had to edit programs where I found stuff like this in C or Perl: printf("blah blah blah-n" ) ;} I mean, no concern whatsoever for indentation or even readable formatting. I've also seen people come up with really wierd variable naming conventions, or those which simply take good ideas too far: transputers again was: The dissolution of Commodore 2933 snip C's switch is brain-dead. I much prefer a more powerful case statement. Some languages have this. COBOL is... floatvarreferencingtotal = &floatvarholdingtotal; ... ... ... } But far worse at times is the boneheaded stuff: int function() { char buffer1000; return buffer; } ...and then so it used like: buf = function(); anotherbuf = function(); They just happen to get lucky and don't trip on their stacks, and so they don't see that there is a problem. "We'll fix it if we see a problem." I've always hated the fact that so many got into programming for the money. I can't think of a worse reason, because if you don't love it, you'll definitely hate it no matter how much you make, and-or you just won't have the drive to do a good job. transputers again was: The dissolution of Commodore 2934 You likely don't recognize the name. You're in a maze of twisty little pbuttages, all the same...
-- shannon "AT" widomaker.com -- There is a limit to how stupid people really are -- just as there's a limit to the amount of hydrogen in the Universe. There's a lot, but there's a limit. -- Dave C. Barber on a.f.c.
|
||||
transputers again was: The dissolution of Commodore 2933 Alt Folklore Computers from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||