Al Gore Gets Global Warming Science Right According To Experts 189

Alan Baker

The implication was it was different ingredients.

You used a lot of words where a simple "yes" would have sufficed.

As a result of an accident or sabotage.

To have the same conditions as a reactor disaster.

Nonsense. That's exactly the method they use. Different hydrocarbons condense at various heights in distillary column.

Is that why you asked how they could condense?

You beat me to that.

No, you didn't know about what fact checking I did before your first post.

Gaffaw! Sure you did, Alan, sure you did.

I did so in another reply.

Whoa... what's happening to Alan "had the facts for years" Baker?

Seawater separates into strata according to temperature and salinity. I'll bet the atomic mbutt of the salt and water stay the same. Yet they stratify. Boggling, isn't it?

I think what I said is obvious. You're trying to think of a chaotic, catastrophic event as if you could predict its outcome the way you would for mixing chemicals in a test tube.

Please provide the kind of proof you keep demanding from me, okay?

Again?

Is that ego stacked on top of arrogance, or the other way around?

Yes, and you don't know, and can't possibly say, that that destiny can not be achieved by melting enough nuclear material together, all at once.

I said enough nuclear material in one place can explode like a plant.

Then I said I'd accept the experts' opinion that it can not occur during a reactor melt down.

The condraction is of your making, not mine.

Damn, you're going to wear Google out if you keep this up!

Nuclear fuel has U235, just like a plant. What else it has is besides the point. What can be brought together that will go BOOM is the point.

You must be an annoying person to be around, what with that constant nervous laugh of yours...

Puh-lease.... who do you think you're fooling?

Honesty doesn't think its funny. It wishes you'd come back.

There's that nervous laugh again...

I see you couldn't think of a reply, again.

Those letters don't really hide your lack of an argument.