Another time Alan Baker was wrong... no surpise to anybody... 591
On 17-7-06 12:38 PM, in article
According to your own rules Edwin Alan Baker cannot possibly be wrong!
The comments that Alan Baker made came from a post according to you made on ....Sat, Jul 17 2004, and the corrected info came from an article referenced again by you dated August 17, 2005 over a year after Alan's original comment!
And the proof that Alan could not be wrong was also supplied by you here....
When you were asked...
Why do you keep denying this? You know as well as I do that the posts remain in the google records, and you know from experience that I won't hesitate...
"Will you simply admit that you were wrong? How long will it take?"
about another topic your reply was......
"I wasn't wrong according to the information available at the time"
Why don't you apply the same rules that you seem to follow to Alan baker as his comments were made not knowing that someone else was lying as your referenced article of August 17, 2005 indicates, therefore he too was commenting based on the information available at the time, unless of course you wish to explain how Alan Baker could have gotten that info over 12 months ahead of the author of your referenced article!
What's good for the Goose...etc...etc!
-- "Your punishment is to use a PC forever..."-Edwin