Article: No need for Congress, no need for courts 2171
On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:40:52 -0700, Snit
A) Don't rely on Wikipedia for your information. B) It's not the sort of treaty that applies to consbreastutional law. C) The fact that it 'trumps all other treaty obligations' makes it incompatible with the US consbreastution. How can we abide by all treaty requirements when one treaty would require us to ignore the requirements of other treaties?
I prefer the "Iraq has oil, we need oil" reason. Can you cite an example of my justifying the war in Iraq by saying that Iraq ignored UN resolutions?
PARIS, May 12 (UPI) -- The French Senate has softened a lower house bill that Apple Computer Co. called state-sponsored piracy. When the National buttembly approved a measure last month that would have...
Countries always have, and always will follow double standards--this is the way it should be.
No one here wants to know about your deviant loveual practices, poo. As to the original point, it is your responsibility as an advocate for a particular position to demonstrate the facts that would support your own argument. It's not my responsibility to do your investigative footwork for you, poo.
I've told you before. Admit you lied through your teeth in that particular argument, and I'll put you back on my killfile and ignore you from now on. Until then, I'll keep pointing out what a dishonest troll you are. It's remarkably therapeutic to thrash you in these silly little arguments.
Having trouble with English again, are you poo? I clearly stated that *your* glbuttes were the strangely-tinted ones. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt--the other option is that you were simply making up bullpoo.
They're your own words, poo. I just removed the extraneous bits and corrected your typos.
Sony brings remote TV to Macs By Martyn Williams Sony plans to unveil new client software next week that will extend...
I'm referring to you by your online name, poo.
It's either that, or you simply lack anything approximating ethics. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt.
As stated above, I'm pretty sure none of the regulars in this group are interested in your 'education'.
You are getting your own quotes confused with mine, poo. Again.
Probably not. The bit about providing proprietary codes to rivals in a way that does not weaken DRM sounds like...
I don't want to know about your loveual practices poo. Stop offering to teach us about them.
Only if you wanted to effectively convey your point. Baseless accusations and unsupported buttertions won't take you very far with skeptics like myself.
It obviously bothers you, else you wouldn't keep going on about it.
Actually, I was asking you to support your position. I did so in a less abrasive manner, but next time I'll simply demand that you do so with a sharp "Provide your god damned sources, you stupid f***ing troll".