Holy cow! 476

What do you mean? I'm answering the question.

If *YOU* get 44 people to call you a troll - you're a troll If *I* get 44 people to call me a troll - I'm a troll

If *YOU* get 100 people calling me a troll - I'm not a troll If *I* get 100 people calling you a troll - you're not a troll

Totally consistent and totally logical.

Obviously not. See above.

Well, it *is* based on your "logic", so that doesn't come as a surprise.

Exactly. And as it is - no one has made these 44 people call you a troll but yourself. Which says more about you than it does about them.

So, all those 44 persons are all trolls? How do you think you'll be able to substantiate that? Plus, Edwin can't buttign you any point since he is a self-admitted troll.

The list is fully referenced.

So all these 44 people described you as a troll but didn't mean it? I know I mean it when I call you a troll. Who doesn't?

Which I don't.

Exactly.

Nopes.

Or rather, what you want to be lies, or we wouldn't be "trolls". All 44 of us.

Funny how you're the only one in this group that think these people are trolls.

Hehe, so your defense is that 44 people claimed you were a troll because everyone else claimed you were a troll? They just rode along on the "call Snit a troll" ride out of joy. Funny how that seems to be the only ride in the Snit Circus.

For the sake of sanity, I'm going to boldly claim that at least the majority of all those 44 people actually stated something they believed in themselves.

Obviously *my* claims about you are subjective, but the list is objectively collected and contains claims from 44 different people. That's Forty-four.

Where is this "Carroll's list"?

I've not mentioned Carroll. You have.

Because they weren't substantiated. They were just sentences. Give me a tab-delimited textfile with this syntax:

ISO-formatted date looks like this: "2006-02-04", which is "YYYY-MM-DD".

-- Sandman.net