How to Shut the Mouths of the WinDupes 922
You could be right. Your theoryisa scientific one, in that it is testable. You will recall the conundrum of the missing solar neutrinos: Turns out they weren't missing at all, but had changed to a different "flavor" of neutrino on their journey to our detectors. This took some years to resolve, but it was resolved, and your theory can be proved or disproved as well. Of course, you have to have your theory peer-reviewed and accepted for publication if you want serious scientists to start working on it. That's the system that is used to separate the science from the nonsense.
How to Shut the Mouths of the WinDupes 923
There aren't any, because no one is attacking it, because it's market share is too small to be worth the trouble The onus is on...
Now, please cite justoneinstance in which Mac OS X was compromised-hacked-penetratedin-the-real-world. You keep avoiding this question, and you will certainly find a way to avoid it again if you happen to answer this post. Either way, you have, through your silence on the subject, stated quite loudly thatneither-you-nor-any-other-person-can-cite-even-one-security-compromise-of-OS-X.
-- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com