Kudos to Sandman 3223
No, it hasn't. If it had, there would be comments from you above.
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:19:35 GMT, Mitch That's really irrelvant. Why? Because it doesn't matter how complex or well thought out the security is where flaws are...
Here it is again:
These were your claims:
1. Your HTML doesn't validate Ê Ê - Could be interpreted as a suggestion. I corrected my HTML since Ê Ê Ê having validating HTML is a good thing, obviously. It's an Ê Ê Ê obvious "suggestions" that a trained monkey teaching a Ê Ê Ê dreamweaver clbutt could give.
Ê Ê : Action taken: HTML now validates.
2. Your CSS doesn't validate Ê Ê - This was an incorrect claim.
Ê Ê : Action taken: None.
3. You make bad use of whitespace Ê Ê - This was not only incorrect, it was uninformed. Plus, it's Ê Ê Ê ambiguous at best. It could mean anything. It's one of those Ê Ê Ê claims that someone that doesn't know Êwhat they're talking Ê Ê Ê about says. Again, this was an incorrect claim, and as far away Ê Ê Ê from a "suggestion" you can come.
Ê Ê : Action taken: None.
4. Your images are poorly compressed. Ê Ê - Also an incorrect and ignorant claim, coming from someone that Ê Ê Ê knows nothing about building web sites.
Ê Ê : Action taken: None
5. Your site isn't made with printing in mind Ê Ê - No poo, Sherlock? That's a feature. You're not supposed to Ê Ê Ê print it. Duh. Also not a suggestion, just an uninformed Ê Ê Ê observation. It's like saying that "Hey, this toilet is not Ê Ê Ê suited for football games"
You never showed me anything of the kind. All pages that are served by my CMS system has a "Validate HTML" link (that only I can...
Ê Ê : Action taken: None
6. Poor contrast Ê Ê - Again, incorrect and uninformed.
Ê Ê : Action taken: None
So, I ask again - which are these imaginary suggestions you think you've given me and how did I follow them? You're a legend in your own mind where you think you know how to build web sites.
-- Sandman.net