New Patch Fixes 43 Flaws In OS X, Many Serious 2135
Read it again. Uh... maybe you should get someone to help you this time;)
snip- Mac OS has little malware Well, expecting advocates to be impartial is asking quite a lot, I think. You can certainly read the arguments, such as they are, if you chose. You...
I answered your overly vague question with the answer it deserved.
Here's a thought:
If you want a better answer, ask a better question.
You, being a 'teacher' an' all... should know this.
Again... "different" in what way? Molecularly? Visibly to the naked eye? Different in *any* respect? Or in *all* respects? There are factors involved that can change the answer... it depends on the "things" and what aspect of those things you are referring to (as well as who is doing the looking). Regarding your 'issue', if a man could become invisible and go into a room where a woman and a man were having love in a particular way and then he went into another room where two first cousins (of opposing lovees) were performing the same love act the man would probably say he witnessed two "things" that, to him, appeared "identical". Yet, according to you, these two things are so drastically different that only a pervert would consider them "similar". I would ask you: On what basis do you consider this invisible man a pervert?
Now, if that same man went into a room where a man and a woman were having love in a particular way and then into another room where two men were engaging in oral love he would probably say that he not only did not witness two "things" that were "identical", they were not, in his opinion, even "similar". Yet, according to you, these two "things", both being "love", are "similar". But on what basis are they? Relative to what?
Perhaps so. I feared that you would try to define Unix arguments from there. I think I gave you the *right* one; Unix is a brand owned by X-Open and it is licenced by...
Your answer for that is: Relative to the fact that they are *not* incest (which is also a "love" act, that, with respect to the "act" itself, *can* be "identical" to non-incestuous love acts).
You mean "by defining terms differently," don't you? I'm trying to get someone to come up with a reasonable definition of "unix...
"Actually", you're the guy who couldn't answer the pertinent questions regarding your vague queries. I know better than to fall for one of *your* semantic setups. If you ask a question and I don't ask at least a dozen or so questions clarifying it all, you get confused with the answer... like you did here;)
That you never tire of losing your feeble, stillborn arguments? Yes, it is.
-- "Not only do I lie about what others are claiming, I show evidence from the Êrecords." - Snit "Even in the U.S., even in a court room, a lack of proof is not a refutation." - Snit "I seriously wanted to be carted away. I need help. I now see that." - Snit