New Patch Fixes 43 Flaws In OS X, Many Serious 2161
Daniel Johnson
From what little you know, and have googled no doubt to find out what you could know, yes it was the best you could have done.
Not from your position of ignorance.
Now who would you think that might be? Surely not those voices you hear?
So far... none. Why? Because it is just too difficult to engineer. It is so much easier for the script kiddies to get their rocks off hacking and making viruses for windows.
I don't need to wish anything away. So far, Windows viruses: 114,000 vs OS X: 0. The facts do speak.
Which means I haven't seen this thrashing on OS X (Unix) yet.
An unlikely scenario. Are you SURE you aren't an MSCE??
Daniel Johnson Guffaw! And who might that be? It wasn't a virus. It was social engineering... or phishing. Again, you are spewing...
Sounds to me like you are making all of this up. Doesn't even remotely come close to what Rago had written on how fork() works and how memory is allocated.
Do you supose someone else's position of ignorance would be better? :D snip Not quite. The recent iChat virus also had a conventional "app-infection" vector. It was...
I did. And, I'll give it to you again:
"Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment" 2nd Edition, W. Richard Stevens & Stephen A. Rago. ISBN: 0-201-43307-9
Guffaw!!! :-))
-- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?