| PLEX86 | ||
OT: This Week In Voting Machine Security 3424
You said "war"; none of those examples was a war. Each of those limited actions (except for El Shifa) was justified. El Shifa was the result of faulty intelligence. I am not about to research whether any Democrats protested El Shifa; I have more important things to do with my life. The invasion of Iraq was a war, and was not justified; one can't justify it on the basis of faulty intelligence because there was enough intelligence to show that Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11, and did not have any WMD at the time, nor at any time since 9-11. Bush's attack on Iraq was unprovoked aggression, and as a libertarian you should be protesting it, not defending it. He did not denounce all Americans there as war criminals. None of which negates what he did to earn those medals in the first place. Your politics are pretty redolent themselves. -- Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush. OT: This Week In Voting Machine Security 3425 Some people don't accept what others label as "facts" until some kind of proof can be shown. You presented your argument which stated that "Bush is guilty of breaking the law" and...
|
||||