OT An Inconvenient Truth

Its an editorial that presents several facts and then bases its opinion upon them. You seem to think that editorials contain nothing but lies and fairy tales. If you want to dispute the facts presented then lay out your competing case. Screaming 'Editorial' does not negate the facts that you don't care for no matter how many times you say it does.

The scientific case for 'global warming' depends on the opinions of scientists who say it is real and ignores the opinions of those who disagree. That the global warming fundamentalists have seized control of the issue and largely kept the others from being heard doesn't mean that they don't exist. In the 70's we had the same claims of 'consensus'; the same derision of people who doubted 'science' and the same hysteria about a new Ice Age. Wanna guess who was right then? Al Gore claims to be 'in the know' on this issue. He claims to be very concerned about the issue. Yet he won't even take the action to switch his mbuttive houses to wind power. That someone who screams the loudest about this issue seems to be not actually concerned when it comes time to put rhetoric into action tells the thinking man quite a bit about 'the cause'.