Read a rumor that DTrace will be in OS X Leopard. 3219

Yes... in a moral sense (as opposed to a legal one). The very definition of "guilty" is being responsibility for having committed a "reprehensible" act (a crime, an offense), as opposed to a good one - note that one isn't "guilty" of committing a good act, the word always refers to a "reprehensible", "evil", "wrong", bad, improper or offensive act.

guilty PPronunciation Key(glt) adj. guiltier, guiltiest 1. Responsible for or chargeable with a reprehensible act; deserving of blame; culpable: guilty of cheating; the guilty party.

The concept of morality is implicitly raised in such an argument:

morality n 1: concern with the distinction between good and evil or right and wrong; right or good conduct ant: immorality 2: motivation based on ideas of right and wrong syn: ethical motive, ethics, morals

As it's implicit it needn't be specifically mentioned. That you believe *your* moralistic considerations aren't being addressed in a specific reference to a guilty party over a specific offense isn't relevant.

That's another issue entirely.

Uh... much of the stuff below is what *you* wrote;)

-- Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD - Snit Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself - Snit I am a bigger liar than Steve - Snit