Steve lies to cover his ID theft
Point to the reason that I need a defense that doesn't involve some delusion you are having;)
How does one defend against a delusion other than to point out that it is a delusion?
No, my defense was that your accusation was based entirely on a delusion you were (and apparently still are) having. I've pointed this out to you several times... often when you do you usual 'snip out of context' game that pretends I've admitted to posting as John. From the same post that you snip, I wrote the following in defense of your accusation that I forged John:
"Only a delusion has you believing this is true."
Obfuscated? Point to any post written by you or Phil that ever showed one shred of evidence that I posted as John. See how this all works YET?
Here's my test: Who *wouldn't* guess the above quote referenced you? Hint - it isn't any of the people who have authored the following quotes: ***************** from a recent Quotes thread ****************** Snit: "I do...
The only attention you are drawing to yourself here is that you are a delusional nitwit;)
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit