Stupid f***ing Safari! 2823
Of course there is! look closely at what you wrote.....here let me help you out ...again..
The first part deals with the relationship between 'incest' and 'love'! The second part deals with the relationship between 'love' and 'incest'!
If you really want to hold to the view that 'synonymous' in the first part is defined by 'equate' in the second part then you are drawing no distinction between the subjects that you are comparing, showing that you and only you see no difference between comparing incest to love or love to incest, that fits nicely with your stated view that the order when discussing incest-love makes no difference! but is contrary to every other view that incest and love are not the same!
If you wanted both parts to compliment each other then you should have exchanged "incest" and "love" in the first part! you didn't so they don't!
It should have read... love, for most people, is not synonymous with incest... The fact that *you* equate love with incest is not my problem.
Stupid f***ing Safari! 2824
Exactly! Someone has set your computer date to April 1st? Correct! Someone "reasonable, accurate, honest and honorable" should at least have the ability to provide one instance where I have claimed that...
Then what in your view does incest 'equate' to if not love? (Yes I am aware that you will not answer that question but decided to ask anyway just for giggles!)
So when you define synonymous as being identical you are defining identical as being 'close enough' to being the same? LOL!
Correct! well done Snit, you appear to have learned not to 'Doctor' my quotes, Now if only you would apply the same lesson to the quotes from Tim
See what I mean? again you butcher Tim Adam's actual quote, can you point out where you claim he has agreed that how you present it is correct? Or is this another instance of you only being able to make a point by lying?
-- "With enough glue... anything is possible" - Snit