Why Its Pointless To Argue With Global Warming Believers 2001
The current pattern of change does not appear to resemble pre-human historical events. There has been extensive study of this. See, climatologists get their grant money (to put this in terms you might understand) whether global warming is caused by human activity or by something else, and the answer to this question could have pretty big implications, so they're more than willing to look at the full range of possible causes.
It's a hell of a lot harder to move cities and vast agricultural operations than it is for a bunch of nomads to change their migration routes. Moreover, it won't just be sea levels rising a few millimeters a year or something, which is a problem that, while costly, would be manageable without catastrophe. It's very well established that higher ocean temperatures produce more severe tropical storms, which means there will be sudden violent weather events to deal with as well as slow changes in sea level, optimal land use, etc.
bless us with the following wisdom: The Global Warming Fundamentalists have told so many lies that its hard to believe anything they say. I still want...
I don't know why you guys are so hopeful that global warming has natural causes. If we're causing it, maybe it's not to late to do something. If e.g. solar variation is causing it (not presently considered likely), we're screwed.
-- "Those who enter the country illegally violate the law." -- George W. Bush in Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28, 2005