Why Its Pointless To Argue With Global Warming Believers 2025
(snip)
LOL! Yeah... sure... they talked about legal tender because they weren't talking about legal tender... whatever you say, Znu ;) Care to explain your reading to me? Will it include the concept mentioned in it... you know... legal tender? Will there be any mention of gold and silver coin in your explanation? Or was this just the most confusing way they could come up with to say 'no paper'?
Sigh...
So "make" had nothing to do with legal tender and payment. Gotcha.
Yes, that is what they called paper money and that is why the line is included, but what you're saying is that they made not one but two references to not allowing the printing of paper by the states. Here are
1 - not emit bills of credit (fiat money - this one makes sense because we know they referred to these as paper money)
LOL! Would you have preferred I snipped as you did above? The states didn't pay dollars worth of money in pennies and nickel... not even in the silver...
2 - the legal tender statement involving gold and silver (your reading is completely out of whack on this).
snip Nice answer. In more clear, modern language, the clause basically says "States aren't allowed to make coins, or make paper money, or decide that something other...
According to you, the reason for the 2nd reference was to bar the states from printing paper money... it had nothing to do with legal tender... which you seem to feel had absolutely NO meaning at all to them... even when they wrote the f***ing document and were arguing about all this stuff. If Article 1 sec. 10 doesn't have any meaning besides barring the states from printing paper, why the need for Consbreastutional (mis)interpretation by the SC regarding legal the tender issue? Tell me, have you ever read any of the comments of the founder's at the time the Consbreastution was written?
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit