Why Its Pointless To Argue With Global Warming Believers 2075

Says the guy who was just seen claiming silver is more malleable than gold;) Anyway... I didn't move the discussion to jewelry... someone else did that (Znu?)

How do you propose to prove I'm lying? Will it be the same way as all the other times (with your delusions)?

Professional hunter? Point to me saying that.

Believes me about what?

Sure, sure... gold has no value, so when asked to turn it in, everyone complied 100% (cap the tube, Snit).

Why? You'll just deny it anyway... if you even understood it.

You think a person needs to be a goldsmith to have a bias for gold over paper? Gee, you've come up with some crazy poo but this is out there... even for you.

Obviously to lend credence to the idea that I might know that gold is more malleable than silver... which it is... despite your claim to the contrary. You getting how this works yet? See, you have to make claims that lead people to believe you have a clue about the topic. Apparently you've forgotten that the *real* teachers online distanced themselves from you. Trust me, no one will mistake you for a goldsmith, either.

I don't think there is anyone you could offer it to that would believe you are an actual accredited teacher. Even you said you have no credentials... another of the things you've forgotten.

Sure, Snit... whatever you say;)

-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit