Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 507
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
Mainly because Apple went 100% Wintel HW.
Says the guy who can't even tell the ruth about where he lives.
No George those things define a PC to you. Why anyone would care about your opinion of a PC is a bit of a mystery. You love to declare anyone's opinion that doesn't march in lockstep with yours as 'uninformed'. The fact is that the most uninformed opinions I've ever heard are yours wrt the PC. If your stories about your PC encounters aren't obvious, outright lies then they expose you as absolutely clueless about them. Why you can't see that is anyone's guess...oh, wait...its because you're little more than a big ignorant gasbag hooked up to a big mouth.
LOL! Why would Intel based HW start using Intel technology. I do love the way that you Maccies have defined EFI as 'superior' just because Apple went with it over a traditional BIOS. But then again if Apple had gone with a handcrank on the side you'd be declaring that the best thing ever too.
Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 508
My current one doesn't even HAVE a connection for a Parallel cable. What good would a Parallel port on my "Winbox" be? And additionally, I've not even used a floppy...
LOL! I love it when people post 'I don't care' as a response to a post. If they truly didn't care they wouldn't have responded at all.
LOL! Says the guy who has been using MacOS for 20 years. Ease of use is a function of familiarity. Guys who are very familiar with the Unix command line find it to be the easiest to use UI.
Says the guy who is totally uninformed when it comes to Windows.
So its in 'good taste' to delete any email you recieve if it didn't originate from a MacOS X box? That pretty much sums you up, George.
But be sure and hold up a display with one of George's posts to the mirror first. That way you'll be correct.
-- "We believe Internet Explorer is a really good browser. Internet Explorer is my browser of choice."