PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |  Successes  |  In the Media  |  Newsgroups

Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 555


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

ewin-lost blather snipped.

No, edwin-lost, YOU were the one in the coma. We've been over this before in the past and you didn't pay attention then, and you're not paying attention now either. IBM failed to protect is design and other parts of the original PC which allowed Compaq to birth the first clone.

Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 556
Jim Polaski You got it back-buttwards, as usual, Jim. Even if we accept what you wrote above, how does that make me wrong in saying IBM had no control over IBM clones? Nobody...

As for Apple's cloning efforts BEFORE SJ came back, Apple entered into cloning licenses that were a better than good deal for the cloners. Power Computing was *supposed* to only sell in markets that Apple wasn't interested in, but then Power Computing's first ads were in MacWeek, going for the Apple's market space. Second, Apple made little on the licensing and had little control given the contracts that were not SJ's which I think were Amelio or Spindler's. Thus, SJ cancelled the cloning since it was literally costing Apple, not making a profit. Apple was losing two ways, in the market place and with the licensing contract.



Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next

Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 556

Mac OSX Advocacy from Newsgroups

Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 554