Why Microsoft Should Fear Intel Macs" 556

Jim Polaski

You got it back-buttwards, as usual, Jim.

Even if we accept what you wrote above, how does that make me wrong in saying IBM had no control over IBM clones?

Nobody will be surprised when you can't answer.

You mean licenses that allowed fair compebreastion between all Mac builders?

Now comes the time for you to supply the type of documentation that you, Alan, and other Maccies are always clamoring for: document the contract terms that spelled out which markets the cloners were allowed to sell in.

That takes nothing from what I wrote above.

IOW, you're just making this up as you go along.

Right, for the reasons I gave above.

That's the same reason put two different ways.

-- "But SunOS was just a purchased OS. Like Apple, Sun purchased and sic OS and then developed it. No more." -- Alan "Wrong Again" Baker