| PLEX86 | ||
macs still cost more 959
Only to someone with poor English comprehension Only to someone with poor English comprehension. Still no support for your claim. Where's the support from you that there are no new TCO studies that favor the Mac? You know, to support your claim. I don't need to support anything since I've made no claims. Obfuscation. I haven't asked for a list of the Web sites you've read. I've asked for a list of resources that is accepted by you as being valid resources for TCO studies for the Mac that does not have any recent TCO studies for the Mac. I.e. something like "IDC would be a valid resource - here is a link to their recent studies from the last five years and Mac TCO studies isn't in them". I would expect at least twenty or thirty such links for your claim to be called "the truth". I never lie. And it's further reinforced by the fact that you can't counter my claims. Which is why I don't do them. That's your thing. No, I'm not demanding that you prove a negative. I am demanding that you support your claim, a claim you could only have made honestly through investigation. Document your investigation. Which one? macs still cost more 960 Snit Where's your link to the above? How could you even have that report when you... -- Sandman.net
|
||||