zaras goal 1111
The support was in the original post. Too bad your reading comprehension is so bad that you didn't understand it.
Living people are commonly reported as dead. My favorite was the guy who played Captain Kangaroo. I heard of...
Actually it proves you to be the pervert.
snit snipped "Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order." and according to posts of his in the past claiming I responded to items I clearly snipped from my response, he is also responding to that line.
If Bud Abbott and Lou Costello were alive today, their infamous sketch, "Who's on First?" might have turned out something like this: *COSTELLO CALLS TO BUY A COMPUTER FROM ABBOTT* ABBOTT...
Did you see me use the word 'subset' anywhere in my statement? As such, you're just trying to run and hide from your embarrbuttment. The FACT that the line you responded to contained Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order." proves your statement above just babbling.
Yet you've agreed that Of course it is... can you find *any* quote where *anyone* has questioned that?" Changing your tune now?
Yet it is your writing that points out that YOU are the pervert, using your own definition.
You mean like your idea of a "subset"? Regarding your initial love-incest statement to Elizabot, you pointed me the following definition for the word "love": love n 1. either of the two reproductive categories...
You agreed that "Incest IS love by the very definition of the words. Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order." but claim that anybody that thinks they are similar is a pervert making you a pervert. Guess that if that makes me 'a sicko' it makes you one also.
snip) You mean like your idea of a "subset"? Regarding your initial love-incest statement to Elizabot, you pointed me the following...
So I guess you are now admitting that you forged the quote that you attributed to me. You know the one where you wrote some babbling and I responded to a couple of words of that babbling with a 'Thank you'., yet you continue to claim I responded to the full length babbling that I snipped. If not then YOU agreed that "Incest IS love by the very definition of the words. Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order." by merely responding to it with your quote Of course it is... can you find *any* quote where *anyone* has questioned that?"
Which is it snit? You lying with your claim that you didn't forge a quote of mine or did you respond to my full quote? Put up of shut up.
Snit's refusal to deal with this shows at least one of the following three things is true: 1 - Snit doesn't comprehend what he...
BTW, in order for something to be a subset of another, it has to contain many of the characteristics of the main set. Why not list all of those items that you think make incest 'so different' from love.
To bad I've never claimed "love and incest are "identical"." as you wrote. IF you had t he ability to read and comprehend what you read, you would know that by now.
-- reguarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm