zaras goal 1112

You mean like your idea of a "subset"?

Regarding your initial love-incest statement to Elizabot, you pointed me the following definition for the word "love":

love n 1. either of the two reproductive categories, male or female, of animals and plants 2. loveual intercourse 3. loveual activity or behavior leading to it 4. the genitals (literary) 5. the set of characteristics that determine whether the reproductive role of an animal or plant is male or female

Over the same argument with Elizabot, you've then issued this statement (along with a Venn diagram that was hilarious):

"love is a subset of loveual activities"

Let's forget about the fact that "loveual activity" is listed as one of the "subsets" of the word "love" you provided me and focus on your bizarre form of "logic" which has you labeling the following as 'loveual Activities':

1 - either of the two reproductive categories, male or female, of animals and plants

2 - the genitals (literary)

3 - the set of characteristics that determine whether the reproductive role of an animal or plant is male or female

LOL!

(snip Snit's delusions)

-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit "At least you can see my "total lack of ... dishonestly and obnoxiousness" -Snit