Is there an inconsistency

Ulisse

Maybe you'll get the idea this time around...

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Since you didn't post any information on your RAM spec at all, and since the problem is with your RAM, nobody can really tell you anything other than what you've already been told.

Getting anything?

-- Found in uk.comp.os.linux: "I had a look in comp.os.linux.advocacy and just despaired. People buttume posting anti-MS articles is somehow pro-Linux. If you have to smear MS to make linux look good, what does that say about Linux?"