Ad for a job in India 4098
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Kamal R. Prasad
But, it does render judgements regarding unfair trade practices and all that you wrote above did not acknowledge that. All you did was bring up an irrelevant set of issues without acknowledging that the WTO really DOES deal with trade issues.
The idea of comparative advantage, and of paying someone else to do work if they can do it more cheaply than you, and that this will in the long run improve...
A govt is free to
If they are a member of WTO, they have to abide by WTO provisions or they get kicked out and lose trading priviledges. Being that the USA is a big cash cow for virtually everyone (viz. the large account deficit the USA has with virtually all of its trading partners), nobody wants to get kicked out and everyone not in wants in.
You ALWAYS thumped on the notion that whatever BMOs want to do, its: i) OK with you, and ii) to hell with anyone that is hurt in the process because you didn't cause it (what I call the "cop-out" excuse.)
-but I did say the general public has no
And, to which, I gave many examples of trust-busting, monopoly-busting, racial-religious-speech-age rights all enacted by government against unfair practices by your "private capital."
You cannot possibly force a person to hire
1. He may not be getting a better bargain elsewhere. 30% of offshoring is found unsatisfactory. Maybe in a few years this trend will increase, too. 2. People are 'forced' to do many things including pay taxes, and incentives are sometimes available. There has been some talk of chaning tax laws to reduce the size of this "bargain elsewhere." We shall see.
It may well be
What is or is not a right depends on more details in the situation than BMO selfish-greedy interests.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2005, Kamal R. Prasad ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You did not cite your reference for this statement. Here is my source and...
Oh, software theft in India is right up there in the stratosphere, too. So, India is just as big of a theif but I'll bet you don't want to talk about that, do you?
^^^^^^^^ whats this?
But, this is what I'm saying. Besides the law, the violators (the ones who hire h1bs) also have all kinds of other tricks and they use them.
There have been a few legal actions brought against employers.
Which may be questionable based on our ethics laws.
The anti-compebreastive laws are more
This is essentially what I am saying.
Revlon? Lets look at the trade surplus India already has with the USA.
That is for the litigation to determine. Not you.