Evidence for global climate change 1901

is

Yes it all does. Scientific journals, scientific agencies -- it all agrees.

No, it goes to the issue that the debate is over.

still

Sure, you can claim you've discovered how to turn lead into gold. It's a jury -- science -- that decides if you're right.

Someone has to check methods, interpretation, reproducibility, etc. That's how science works (not that you'd know).

"The debate is over."

As is temperature.

Warming is demonstrated by measuring temp. That humans produce CO2 is demonstrated by burning fuel. That CO2 traps heat is easily demonstrated in lab.

No, it's that humans produce CO2, that this is the only possible source of the 30% increase in CO2 since 1880, that CO2 traps heat, and that the earth is warming. Pure logic.

You'd have us believe humans produce CO2, but it goes off into some other dimension. Then the added CO2 in the atmosphere comes from never-never land. And some mysterious unknown source is causing the warming.

Occam's Razor.

be

Well, it was your analogy restated.

Idiot.

Which means you're either an idiot or a liar. Which?

I can't help noticing you don't know one iota about science.

That's the entire issue, doofus!

So is buried coal. So?

Me too. You've swallowed a Latin dictionary and you use that to try to make the fact that you know absolutely no science.

Perhaps you like to tell us YOUR scientific education and background.

You're typical of the prosbreastuting yourself to industry crowd.