Evidence for global climate change 1902

Stuart Grey drivel

You are really great about whining about logical fallacies that exist only in your mind; the CO2 to climate change correlations aren't Post Hoc Ergo Propiter Hoc fallacies, because the correlations are simultaneous, not sequential, in the cases being discussed (which "fallacies" you don't understand and so misuse) And what past history of flogging idiocy makes you so aware of all these fallacies, anyway? You must have had them thrown in your face hundreds of times to become so expert. You being a jerk may be an "ad hominem" argument, but that doesn't make the description any the less apt., but you have no science to bring to the subject yourself, while claiming that some "science of one" can be correct even though it fails peer review.

I'm afraid your ideosyncratic "science" doesn't hold much water with the oceanographers and meteorologists I've supported with my software over 11.5 years of my software development career, nor does its flogging by our Mendicator in Chief cut much mustard with the science community what with them currently and frequently calling him to task for his constantly misusing science.

But you go on living in the delusions in which you've wrapped yourself, the planet will overheat quite nicely if the current stupidity continues, whether that overheating has your blessing or not, so time spent trying to educate you isn't well used.

xanthian, living where the forecast highs the next ten days range from 106F to 114F (41C - 45C) and we're wondering whether we'll match this year the dozens who died of heat prostration in the streets last year. This summer is looking warmer, so far, we've surpbutted our usual quota of triple digit heat days for the year, already.