InFocus call center heading to India

Robert Kolker

I crave to see one day when a libertarian will not try to missdirect a discussion.

Nobody talked about nationalization here. I know, whenever a solution to oppose greed is presented, this hurt the libertarian ideology and the talk must be misdirected toward "socialism", "nationalization" and so on just to avoid the real subject.

And this is: corporate responsability. So let get back on track. The core idea is to prevent the rip & run economics. The way globalization is driven now by the multinationals is exactly RIP & RUN.

The economy is a loop. At macroeconomic scale the employees are the consumers. I will use now a simplified model to illustrate the phenomena:

Consumers spend to survive. If you cut their income, they will spend from their savings until all the accumulated wealth of the population vanish. At that point, the population is going to be very easy to enslave.

In order to maintain a free society the population must be able maintain their income. If you oppose this proposal you oppose the freedom itself.

Exactly. The problem is that we have rules allowing the looter to accumulate unearned wealth by looting it from victims.

Only a barbarian savage will consider that is normal for an Paris Hilton to be billionaire while valuable scientists and engineers starve on welfare.