India following facist model according to Indian author 1720

Straydog

and when you define it so -that is your definition, not one accepted by society. It won't make it to the dictionary for that very reason.

that's an adjective to show the bank robber is experienced in that game. A bank robber who ronbs on contract would probably fit the definition of a professional bank robber coz he offers his expertise to would-be employers-customers.

get your fundaes right on capital. That will put inevstors and CEOs in better light in your mind.

and I was talking of the lower clbuttes of america being affected by surplus labour in former communist countries . When new labour markets are created in formerly unstable-economically backward regions -manpower in prosperous regions becomes financially unviable to hire and work shifts to those cheaper locations. Its not about you lending them money, its about them being compebreastively priced for investors-employers.

Understand what I have been telling you over and over again. Money is not wealth, It is a financial instrument invented by the egyptians to transact in goods-services. They have as much residual value as cheques or credit cards. It cost the US govt nothing to print a truckload of dollars to be sent to Russia or to print fake notes to buy a german spy in WWII. The peshmarga guerillas in Kurdistan complained to the US govt before the invasion that the US govt was sending only 100$ bills to them, and that had triggered inflation and tea itself would cost $100 coz that was the only money available to transact in goods-services of which one is tea.

and what was the productivity (end result) of those jobs? how much did it help to reduce trade deficit i.e finanxe the import of goodies by americsns? don't tell me your USD is going to finance it The reason why the Japs and of late the Chinese bought immovable property in the US with the USD is because that immovable property represents trade-able goods (real wealth) and that is one of the things denominated in USD. The USD in itself means nothing unless it can yield real wealth. When you increase money supply, it doesn';t increase the land or any goods-services in any tangible way.

it could well be that he was like W jr and sr a be-fitting president.

corruption exists everywhere and anywhere. It existed in the US, Nato, china, japan etc.. Of late, they are experiecing tremendous prosperity despite corruption and because of macro-economic discipline and not to mention oil.

why don't you evaluate articles based on content rather than where they appear?

yeah -comparative advantage cannot be counted on to create net gains for the workforce. They can be counted on to create net gains for investors -who will have more money to employ more underlings. Further, some comparative advantages are a result of vested interests. If your govt gives comparative advantage on a silver platter to workers overseas -the Ricardo is not to blame for it. If you fix things from your side i.e exchange rates -comparative advantage may well create net gains for american workers too.

if americans accept lower stds of living in line with their productivity, it will allow the US govt to deflaste the USD without triggering inflation and that will lower your cost of living. There are high paying jobs in other countries too, but they pay highly in reoation to the local cost of living. So, adjusting the cost structure should solve lots of problems for you,

fine. when is walmart's supply line going defunct? Your trade deficit will correct itself and the chinese will go back to farming -if all americans can learn from your example and buy american goods only.

I don t have any god given right to the truth. I am just poiting to long established facts-widely held theories. Many a times, I have given you links to statements-research by your own fellow americans.

who will buy their goods and what will finance the overseas workers' retention if not the consumer?

regards -kamal