India following facist model according to Indian author 1721

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Kamal R. Prasad

Doesn't matter. It brings in money as a result of "services" that go out.

All depends on the dictionary and lots of word usage falls outside the dictionary, anyway.

The key issue (for my comment) that might be a detail worth arguing about is that the history books mention that prosbreastutes, even in ancient times, had to be licensed by the state (found not only in ancient Greece, but even in old India according to the book "The Wonder That was India" by A. L. Basham, and its a thick book full of lots of interesting things about Indial

A bank robber who ronbs on contract would probably fit the

He can also be self-employed. Most of them are, or part of a small band of crooks (very much like small bands of corporate officers & their CEO are crooks, but you don't need a license to be an executive).

^^^^^

Nice to see you too lazy to spell even halfway right.

So, can I ask "Do you know something about fractional reserve banking?" So, far, I'm still waiting for an answer from you that indicates you understand that: i) part of the "fountain of wealth" has nothing to do with governments "printing" money, and ii) fractional reserve banking is just about everywhere.

That will put inevstors and CEOs in

CEOs are overpaid, over protected, over pampered, and get special golden parachute deals (plus other gifts) that they have no birthright to, but they are given this and even if they do a bad job.

Investors are like rats that are immoral and unethical in the sense that they will eat anything as long it makes them grow. Hungry rats will even eat themselves (although, there have been situations where humans ate other humans to survive, and the survivors still got thrown in jail).

Only in connection with known processes, but so what?

This is so crazy. You don't have to have "formerly --anything---". All you have to have is agreements to do business. China was never unstable but was being encouraged and helped by the USA from way before the USSR collapsed, and China is nowhere near a collapse. The government is still in control, their flag has not changed, their name has not changed.

Its not about you lending

It has always been the exchange rates that made this possible. Nothing else. Its is fact.

Name anything that your idea of wealth can buy that money can't buy.

It is a financial instrument invented by the egyptians to

When?

They have as much residual value as cheques

Nah, you are way off base on this.

See, this proves to me that you still don't understand -- at least -- fractional reserve banking. And, I still think you don't even understand what stock shares are either despite the fact that you might agree that you can buy stock shares without even getting a piece of paper (but just a change in numbers in a computer).

The

A very poor example of any complaint you have. And, I'm sure that if that were happening, there was good reason for it. And, having nothing to do with your ever repeating empty complaint that implies that the US is the ONLY country on the planet that prints money.

Oh, it fed information into our strategic matrix of defense strategy think tanks. Do you think India has no "strategic matrix"? Just look for Indian think tanks, Indian organizations for lobbying, PR, caucus, all the rest. All that feeds into business for India. And, you barely work for it. It falls out of the sky because of the exchange rates.

how much did

We always had a large "formal" defense industry and also a large "informal" defense industry that sold arms to lots of countries. USSR-Russia sells arms, and so does China. They do the same things. Even France and England sell arms.

Have you heard of Eurodollars? Petrodollars?

The reason

Yeah, and they fact that they could buy it proves that USD is worth something. Its worth more to more countries because it is more stable than most countries.

I got more news for you: almost all of the countries in SEA actually buy things from each other in USD and NOT their own currencies. Why? because its easier to do and they don't induce fluctuations in their own currencies.

When you increase money supply, it doesn';t increase the

OK, smart guy, then tell me why inflation in India is about 5%, just like the USA or maybe even a little worse.

I thank him for a couple of things, but mostly he was a jerk.

"Tremendous prosperity"? Oh, they have a long way to got. Lots of internal squabling. Yeah, they got their oil project going. Do you know where they got a lot of help and money from? And, they are a net exporter of wheat now, do you know how they did that?

Because Wash Post articles can't go into detail and never provide enough background. Good only for "Where is today's earthquake?" and "What is today's baseball scores?" and "How many people end in the Mumbai person plantings?"

Oh, but you left out companies that go out of business and even the executives get laid off, and you left out that the taxes from that business also get left out. And, lots of secondary effects.

I have never seen any good evidence that investors actually "have more money to employ underlings". The only time investors do anything for a company is at the IPO, and maybe if investor psychology causes some kind of bubble that leads to some kind of partial enrichment of a few arbitrageurs (at the expense of lots of suckers, fools, and victims). But, outside of that, you left out too many important details.

Further, some comparative

Such as imposed tariffs and duties. And, many others.

If your govt gives

Yeah, currently besides the exchange rate (and the possibility of cheap telecommunications, invented by the USA), all of our patents that will be expiring mean totally free inventions, developed and paid for with US money and work, falling right into the laps of Indians to make tons of money with. Beautiful free gift to India.

-the

One of the things Ricardo said about money is that it has to be expandable. Thus, all countries, sooner or later, have to print money.

I already gave references to us being the most compebreastive country, the country with the most exports, but you have forgotten all this. Why do you say we are not productive, therefore have to accept lower standards of living? The first phrase and last phrase you wrote must be out of your newspapers.

it will allow the US govt to deflaste the USD without

How about telling the US CEOs to lower their standard of living? They make hundred times more than other CEOs.

How about when will India stop playing games with its "targeting the exchange rate"? I gave a reference to that, too.

There are

Nah, you just invent problems for the USA and ignore your own, and then you are unthankful for all this business that falls into India for free.

Hah! When all the countries start to hate USD. Right now, they love USD. Why would all these countries even do growing business with us?

Oh, now, besides wanting US people to go back to farming, you want Chinese go go back to farming.

How about you tell all of your Indian new middle clbutt to do that, too?

-if all

Not my example.

All of your texts indicate that you think you do.

I am just poiting to

Theories? Did you know that lots of economists disagree with each other?

Many a times, I have given

Shall I give you more links and book breastles by more of my own fellow americans? Well, I already have, but I think you either don't read them, or you read and then forget them.

Nobody in India will buy, in India, goods made in the USA, if India keeps the tariffs high. Here, read this (I've already posted it before, you missed it):

==========