India following facist model according to Indian author 1726
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, alexy
Nah, you didn't show anything except a copy and paste from ONE dictionary.
"well within" according to you, but the fact is, on the fine details, your dictionary was weaker and more inadequate that wikipedia.
Straydog and as the job export traffic grows in sizw, the H1B traffic will come down in size. Its inversely proportional -if you didn't realize. Organized religion is a tool-catalyst that people...
Why, the one you used. I didn't imagine anything.
Do you know that definitions, according to various sources, can vary a lot and you can support any favored definition by simply chosing the source you like best? I think not.
Oh, really? Have you checked all that you have seen to be sure? And, of course, YOU would be the ultimate authority, wouldn't you, in terms of judgement? YOU can just discard anyone else as having an opinion about the applicability of a definition, can't you? Little control freak.
Oh really? I thought a dictionary gave correct spelling and definition, but that "word usage" would fall under the field of semantics.
Oh really? It sure looked to me like you worship dictionary.com (just like you worship CEOs)
Identify means 'name it' and you would get that not from a dictionary since to use a dictionary you already even have to start with at least a very close spelling of a word, hence its almost already "identified", but then if it is identified, then the only other thing you can do is look up the definition. Is that where you are confused? You think an idenbreasty is a definition? LOL.
Just showed that your word usage was correct, at least according to this dictionary. If, for some perverted reason, you want to show that your word usage is incorrect, why don't...
not to fully explain the thing-concept-action, etc. that
the popular idea about india in usa is terribly inadequate -summed up in one or two lines - and usually false to boot. india...
Oh, so if it does not fully explain things (let alone that you go to different dictionaries and get different definitions), then its a defective way to get definitions. But, you are OK with that.
Nah, I just used the word loosely just like most people on the street used the word. But, you had to make a big deal out of a little piece of trivia and you completely missed, altogether, the really big deal that was in the rest of the context.
Yep, you missed the forest for the trees.
So, why did you get lost by making a mountain out of a ant hill? And, its also your loss to miss the important point, as you even did in this response. This is why I don't even care to communicate with you any more.