Indian Education: Actually Terrible !!! 1777

alexy why doesn't text of legislation enacted by the US govt find its way into the statute-consbreastution? in india -it does.

but isn't it a case of living under restricted rights with a sword on one's head? why should employers have anything to do with where a person stays, what his status is and why should good-for-nothings have a veto over the stay or employment of individuals?

you need to collect first hand info about how the H1B legislation affects functioning of H1Bs. There are numerous individuals who put up with difficult situations just to remain in status. Its not about emplioyment -but about the fact that you have spent lot of effort to buy immovable property and if you go out of status -you lose all of that investment.

Slaves were paid during ancient times for their services and at the v least provided food, accomodation etc.. -possibly not much different from unenslaved labour. Meaning farm workers whether indentured or not -were always paid subsistence wages. Slavery is a tactic that extracts more work for less pay as opposed to no pay at all by taking away civic rights of individuals.

the tactics employed have changed over 300 yrs -but from an economic perspective it i8s still the same story. As humans become sophasticated, the modus operandi also undergoes change either due to logistics or due to PR constraints. Theft has undergone change. There are no lockers to break, just pbuttwds to hack. Gambling has gone online, so has prosbreastution. The US govt had a slavery tax which was abolished and that has been replaced by soft money.If opting for a different modus operandi makes you think its not the same crime -then Im afraid I would disagree with you.

what could happen if the illegal appeals his deportation? The fact that he is illegal means he has got to be deported. He may not even find a lawyer on account of the low success rate buttociated with an air tight case like his. Im not suggesting he should be given legal status -but that the thing that got him in the US isn;t his desire to break laws, but the fact that there was a job waiting for him. Take away the job -and neither will anyone benefit from their presence nor will they be able to afford rent and other buttociated higher costs of living in the US. Given that they send huge amts back home and that is going to stop -they themselves will leave and stop coming to the US -regardless of whether or not you build a wall across the border. Conversely, regardless of whether there is a wall or not -jobs will compel them to scale the walls or swim the pacific as long as there are jobs to be had.

regards -kamal