Nbuttcom shrugs off 112 antioutsourcing US Bills

Our Bureau

New Delhi , May 12

THE National buttociation of Software and Services Companies ( Nbuttcom) today said it is not "overly concerned" on the issue of introduction of more than 112 anti-outsourcing bills across 40 States in the US during the first three months of 2005, as State Government contracts currently account for less than two per cent of the total IT work that US outsourced to Indian companies.

"We are not overly concerned about the issue as the US State Government contracts account for a very small proportion of the work for the Indian IT industry. In absolute terms it is valued at about $150 million," the Vice-President of Nbuttcom, Mr Sunil Mehta, said here.

Reiterating Nbuttcom's earlier stance on the issue, he said, "Protectionist measures make industry uncompebreastive and do not serve the interest of end consumers." Mr Mehta further pointed out that in the last two weeks India had awarded one of the largest orders of aircraft to a US company.

Nbuttcom's comments comes in the wake of a recent report by National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) that more than 112 Bills to restrict "outsourcing" have been introduced in at least 40 States, within the first three months of 2005. In 2004, only five anti-outsourcing Bills became law and none of them were far-reaching.

Republican Governors in California, Mbuttachusetts, and Maryland vetoed anti-outsourcing bills, though the outgoing New Jersey Governor, Mr Jim McGreevey, issued a highly restrictive executive order to prevent state work from being performed offshore.

"The reasons for the impulse to impose restrictions on offshore outsourcing are understandable, though misguided. Economic factors that created anxiety about `jobs moving offshore' - global compebreastion, increased productivity, and new job creation distributed unevenly across sectors - have not changed in the past six months. In addition, Bill sponsors may possess political motivations, such as putting members of the other party in a difficult position," the NFAP report noted.

Most State Bills to restrict outsourcing fall into two categories - restrictions on State contract work being performed offshore; and measures to limit the use of offshore call centres. Several state legislators also are attempting to prevent personal data from being sent outside the US, even though existing Federal law already permits sharing of data among affiliate enbreasties without regard to geography and provides for recourse against US companies that fail to take appropriate safeguards.