US Companies' R&D Operations Shifting To India, China 1826

I am currently reading "The Battle that Stopped Rome" by Peter Wells. About Roman General Varus loosing *18,000* men, including himself, in the battle of Teutoburg forest. The mind just boggles; consider the social trauma when Custer lost a mere 148 men. Varus not only got himself end, but the sons of *senators*, and every other prominent house in Rome. And yet, within 200 years, the Romans had the balls to go back into the Black Forest.

The event so changed History, that when Clauswitz wrote "On War", he prolly had this in mind when he advised, in ref to this kind of steep wooded terrain, he said armies should "go around it."

There's also the debacle of Cbuttius in Parthia. Which, come to think on it, was where Alexander was stopped from going further north. In all of these cases, the advantages of well ordered phalanx tactics dont work.

There's one more example from a battle between French knights in shining armor, and Swiss peasant pike men. And in this case, its why the Swiss remained free. They too marched in close ordered drill, each with a pike, which got progressively longer moving back from the front ranks.

A bird's eye view wouldda looked like a sea urchin. when a knight on his war horse charged, the pikemen dropped the butt of the pike into the ground, and the horse took the blade in the chest. All you havta do, is have the guts to stand there while the horse charges.

The Semites dont have the guts. Neither do the Africans. Alpha males in hominid hunting tribes instinctively know how to charge, but standing still is not their thing. They either charge, or flee.

Let me be more precise too in the term 'alpha'. Having the instinct to try to dominate, and the intellectual capacity to succeed at it has very different results. The patriarchic cultures have all viewed women simply as the soil for their seed, whereas in Europe, the women had more power to make more of their own mating choices.

Because of their patriarchic atbreastude, they wanted *obedient* women, and the dim witted are much easier for them to handle. Still to this day, smart women, (I saw some well educated women on TV trying to arrange a ride out of Lebanon) flee the mysogeny and bring their genetic endowment to breed with Aryan Y Chromosome lines. Even the women of the Saudi Royal house were in the USA on 9-11. Nobody has reported, but I bet most are back here now.

Anyway, you may make a phalanx with *smart* alphas, who have the self control to modify their instinctive fight-flite response. And its even easier with smart *betas* who will struggle mightily to stay by their comrades. Like the Swiss yeoman pikemen, they will follow orders, and move across the field. Which was the problem the French knights had. They could literally ride circles around the pikemen's phalanx, but they *could not stop it!* Well, this is the essence of alpha male, to make the enemy submit. Even tho the pikemen could not injure any of the French knights, the latter went home in disgrace. It was *this* battle, not the invention of firearms that came later, which ended the age of the chivalrous knight. It didnt *matter* how brave a knight was.

Native Europeans have always had the most matriarchic cultures for the longest time, going arguably all the way back to the Goddess figures of the Mammoth hunters 25,000 years ago. And when women are in power, they do not seek mates who instinctively try to dominate them. They prefer the beta males who will go along with whatever the head unpleasant woman says.

But just because they are obedient, dont mean they are stupid. After all, their moms were the smart ones. And the result is the geeks who are now so empowered by technology while the strong right arm, sword in hand of the alpha male is just a heavy weight and a drag on his ambitions.

And whereas the patriarchies, out of their own machismo, breed stupid unpleasant womanes, and then unpleasant woman about stupid sons, the matriarchies used birth control, and didnt *breed* the stupid unpleasant womanes. Nowhere is this more evident than the Ashkenazic Jewesses, whose men were never permitted, by Christian patriarchic political systems to have power. They have looked for talented *beta* males who submit (as they did with the Nazis going to the gas chambers without complaint), and in ordinary times are able to practice the intellectual challenges alone- brought to their attention by modern technology. Thus- Einstein.

The Jewesses didnt breed the stupid unpleasant womanes either, but exported them to the pleasure of Christians in power. We will havta see how this shakes out in China and India. Chinese women have long been much more powerful than Indian women. We dont see many Chinese women seeking advanced degrees in the West, but its increasingly common in India. India also has problems like the liquidate of wives for the dowry, which does not exist in either the West or China.

It remains to be seen as well whether the intellectual endowments of the Chinese and Indians, can (because of the greater degree of conformity in these cultures), result in the innovative breakthrus such as we've seen from the Native European geeks who have oddball personalities to go along with their creativity. Remember 'Rainman' Ever seen a Chinese or Indian freak like that?

No, talented women will look for talent like that, and use sperm from men who appear unattractive for the sake of the gifted kids they hope will take care of them in their declining years. The white race is not going to disappear, but what the skinheads, white supremacists, and neonazis really fear, is that their Y chromosomes wont be around.