| PLEX86 | ||
As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 62Gerry Sincere My guess is the high number of articles which are either direct reprint of press releases from M$ or mere re-writes or else quotes w-in articles is very, very high. There's no one in the linux world spending that kind of money on press releases. I wouldn't call itfixedexactly...I'd say, they found what they sought to measure..."positive press", which is purchased by M$. They would then include customer opinion surveys, and so on... As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 63 BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! "I wouldn't call itfixedexactly" How 'un-exactly' isn't it fixed, according to your f***ed up lame reasoning up there, mmm... The very existence of a linux paid installed base of three percent, and an unpaid base of about twenty percent is testament to the rejection of M$. The fact that people woulduninstalla built in Windows, from a preinstalled computer and go to the trouble of installing a brand new OS is praise enough for linux. Like many other pro-M$ "think tanks", such as the Yankee Group and Cato Insbreastute which have been shown to have funding from M$. I just don't want to be downstream from the b.s. factory...oh, and by the way, have you tried Right Guard ? All I said was: they are measuring press releases. And M$ buys a lot of press releases. -- Texeme
|
||||
As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 63 Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 61 |
||||