As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 67
Engrisch not your first language, eh, mutton-chops? Too complicated for you, or are you just too stupid to know what certain parts were telling you?
No, you explain this first, f***up:
"What a load of crap"
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Kier wrote on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:05:01 +0100 Ah, but it's *not...
Wait, don't bother explaining it, go one better than that, substantiate your claim, privatesspurt.
I did. Reread it. You prove why you felt you had to respond to a post you could not debate, zealot. "Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 According...
In the absence of you being able to make your point in your own words, you throw in a couple of quotes. Is that perhaps how you formulated "What a load of crap" through sheer copy 'n' pasted hit 'n' hope?
Don't tax yourself too much on your next post, will you?
Which firm exactly are you referring to there? Pick one: Bacons - Delahaye.
Do you actually know what the difference is and how they came about, and when, and why, and perhaps the methodology used to determine how such a reputation is derived? Well do you? And no, I won't help you with you incapability, that's your area.
Don't you forget how dysfunctional your conclusion was first time - "What a load of crap". Let's see what you can offer to improve on that.
Oh, and your paranoia slip is showing again.
-- Things are looking up.
As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 68
Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups
As expected: Microsoft Earns Best Corporate Reputation in 2004 66