| PLEX86 | ||
Begin bug 16838Begin bug 16839 snips Larry Qualig Sure - but you're failing to include the troll contingent. In an office, you're... In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Kier wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:18:22 +0100 I'd have to look up an exact reference but there is a psychological experiment that verifies this as well (it's mentioned in an old psych book I have -- I picked it up from a secondhand shop for some bizarre reason that I don't remember now; I never took a course in the stuff). The experiment consisted of doing simple tasks and administering mild electric shocks to actors (who were supposed to act as though they were getting zapped by a far more electrifying jolt) whenever the tasks were done incorrectly. The subjects of course were administering the shocks, and were divided into two groups; in one group they were more or less dressed normally, but in the other they were hooded or cloaked. Guess which one administered longer shocks? :-) In Usenet, we're all more or less cloaked; the only thing one sees is the verbiage. I prefer to wear blunt but non-insulting verbiage, and prefer humor to anger. Others, of course, have their own ideas. Possible and probably done on a routine basis. In person I tend to be more excitable, at least at work. If it gets bad enough they can get banished I suppose. The main problem is that they can simply sign up and try again. It's a dual problem, in its way; one is cloaked, but one is also able to polymorph -- and that's *without* doing something illegitimate. That's probably not the one I'm referring to above, but it does sound like more confirmation that we're wired a little weirdly -- or perhaps there's a reason for this wiring that we've yet to discover in the evolutionary scale of things. I can't say. -- It's still legal to go .sigless.
|
||||
Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||