| PLEX86 | ||
Firefox Founders: "We want to make money..." 10156Firefox Founders: "We want to make money..." 10158 begin oeprotect.scr This model only really works well for manufacturing-like industries, where there are no significant constraints on raw materials supply and-or market demand... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:27:10 -0500, Because they'd go out of business, as new compebreastors keep popping up, and they never get to recover their losses from the "dump" stage. Can you give an example of such a market, where one company, undercut everyone, then raised prices, and kept them there, *without* govt force being involved? Because you don't look hard enough, and you artificially limit the "market" PCs are a small segment of the computer market, dwarfed by embedded and other computer segments, and MS doesn't do too well there. so what? that's business, find an advantage, and use it.
Firefox Founders: "We want to make money..." 10157 BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:05:06 -0500, as I pointed out, by... depends on how they become a monopoly, and how they maintain it. If force is involved, like the phone monopoly was, (the govt granted the monopoly, and enforced it) then yes, it's pretty inelastic. Can you show me an example of a natural monopoly like that? something that isn't backed up by govt force?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU-Linux) iD8DBQFC8cVAd90bcYOAWPYRAk7ZAJsELnGTDoipcvApOrLBhs-PbfPYhACg7CwQ Fy3pIztUb3Pwr8QXKE9ZXv4= =njxf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- If you can tell the difference between good advice and bad advice, you probably don't need advice.
|
||||
Firefox Founders: "We want to make money..." 10157 Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||